The Ultimatum Game — put your sense of pride and ideals of justice to the test!

Header — The Ultimatum Game

Inherent within the human character is the belief that we should all be treated fairly. For some, injustice might be high levels of poverty in the developing world, while for others it might be the umpire calling a foul and costing their team the game.

The Ultimate game is a famous experiment used to test people’s values of fairness and cooperation. The most famous description of the game was published in 1982 by the German economists Güth, Schmittberger and Schwarze.

How it works

There are two strangers playing the game — the person proposing the offer and the person receiving the offer. Let’s call them Paul and Rachel.

  1. To start the game, Paul is given a sum of money. In our example we’ll give him $100.
  • If Rachel accepts the offer, they both get to keep the money.
Diagram depicting steps listed above
Diagram depicting steps listed above
  • If you were Paul, how much of your $100 would you offer Rachel?

Traditional economic theory says that Rachel should accept any offer greater than $0. Even if Paul offered her just 5c, she would still be better off than she was before.

But Rachel is not a robot and she knows that a 5c offer from Paul is only 0.05% of the money provided to him. Rather than give him the pleasure of keeping 99.95%, she would rather they both walk away empty-handed.

This game teaches us about humans’ ideals of fairness and pride.

Scales of justice
Scales of justice

Variations to the Ultimatum Game

There are many other variations of the game, which all test different aspects of human negotiation.

  • Two-option ultimatum — where Paul is given only two deal options to offer Rachel — 50/50 (a fair split) or $80 for himself and $20 for Rachel (an unfair split).
A pirate captain and 4 pirate crew
A pirate captain and 4 pirate crew

The value of the Ultimate Game

The Ultimatum Game teaches us how humans operate in a negotiation environment. Where prices are not set based on cost, there is room for disagreement on price and therefore negotiation. The price we are willing to accept is often influenced by our perception of the value being derived by the other party. If we feel that they are going to be extremely well off with the deal — proportionately higher than us, we will try and increase our value at the expense of theirs to reach an agreement where both parties profit equally.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store